11-10

JESUS – BLACK BELT IN MARTIAL ARTS

John 8:3-11; Leviticus 20:10; Matthew 5:17

Rev. Paul Wrightman  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ 11/10/24

 

 

RECENTLY I READ A FASCINATING ARTICLE

ABOUT HOW THE COUNTRY OF FINLAND​​ 

SOLVED ITS PROBLEM WITH HOMELESSNESS.

 

FINLAND WAS WELL-AWARE THAT NO ONE

WAS GETTING ANYWHERE WITH THE TYPICAL APPROACH

OF MAKING GETTING A PERMANENT PLACE TO LIVE

CONTINGENT​​ ON ONE’S GETTING ONE’S ACT TOGETHER​​ FIRST.

 

INSTEAD, FINLAND DECIDED TO TRY A RADICALLY​​ 

DIFFERENT​​ APPROACH.

 

SENSING THAT EVERYONE ELSE​​ 

WAS PUTTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE

BY MAKING GETTING A HOME​​ DEPENDENT

ON JUMPING THROUGH VARIOUS “HOOPS,”

LIKE GETTING A JOB, OR GETTING OFF DRUGS,

 

FINLAND DECIDED TO EXPERIMENT WITH

PUTTING THE HORSE BEFORE THE CART

BY GIVING HOMES​​ TO ALL THEIR HOMELESS​​ FIRST.

 

THE IDEA WAS THAT​​ IF​​ THE HOMELESS​​ 

HAD SOME MORE STABILITY IN THEIR LIVES

BY HAVING A HOME,

THIS ADDED STABILITY WOULD GRADUALLY​​ EMPOWER​​ THEM

TO GET A JOB AND GET OFF DRUGS.

 

THIS RADICALLY DIFFERENT APPROACH​​ WORKED,

AND NOW FINLAND HAS THE LOWEST HOMELESS POPULATION

PER CAPITA OF ANY DEVELOPED COUNTY.

BASICALLY, HOMELESSNESS NO LONGER EXISTS IN FINLAND.

 

THERE IS A DIRECT PARALLEL HERE BETWEEN​​ 

WHAT​​ FINLAND​​ DID WITH ITS HOMELESS POPULATION

AND WHAT​​ JESUS​​ DID WITH SIN AND BROKENNESS.

 

THE OFFICIAL RESPONSE OF “RELIGON” IN JESUS’ DAY –

AND IT CONTINUES TO BE THE OFFICIAL RESPONSE

OF​​ MUCH OF CHRISTIANITY IN OUR DAY --

 

WAS TO INSIST THAT A PERSON FULFILL CERTAIN​​ REQUIREMENTS

BEFORE​​ ONE COULD RECEIVE GOD’S FORGIVENESS AND LOVE.

 

JESUS TOTALLY​​ REJECTED​​ THIS APPROACH

AND OFFERED GOD’S FORGIVENESS AND LOVE

AS​​ THE​​ ESSENTIAL​​ FIRST​​ STEP​​ 

TOWARD WHOLENESS AND RESTORATION.

 

EVEN TODAY MANY CHRISTIANS –​​ 

PERHAPS EVEN A MAJORITY OF THOSE

WHO CLAIM TO BE FOLLOWERS OF JESUS –

WOULD SAY THAT FOLLOWING GOD’S​​ LAW

IS A​​ PREREQUISITE​​ TO BEING OFFERED GOD’S​​ LOVE.

 

THE SCRIPTURE READINGS THAT I CHOSE FOR TODAY –

THE STORY OF JESUS SETTING ASIDE THE LAW​​ 

ON BEHALF OF A WOMAN CAUGHT IN THE ACT OF ADULTERY,

 

THE OLD TESTAMENT LAW HE SET ASIDE,

 

AND JESUS’ OWN CLAIM THAT HE DID NOT COME​​ 

TO REJECT, BUT TO FULFILL OR PERFECT GOD’S LAW –

 

WERE PICKED IN ORDER TO​​ ENABLE US TO WRESTLE

WITH THIS ISSUE OF WHICH COMES FIRST,

GOD’S LAW OR GOD’S LOVE?

 

THE STORY FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN

IN WHICH JESUS FORGIVES AN ADULTEROUS WOMAN ​​ 

 

(AND ONE SHOULD ASK, BY THE WAY, “WHERE’S THE​​ GUY?” –

PRESUMABLY IT TAKES TWO TO COMMIT ADULTERY!)

 

IS JUSTLY FAMOUS BECAUSE IT POWERFULLY DEMONSTRATES

A VERY​​ MARTIAL-ARTS-TYPE​​ MOVE ON THE PART OF JESUS.

 

THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES​​ 

HAVE SET A BRILLIANT AMBUSH FOR JESUS

FROM WHICH THEY ASSUME HE CANNOT POSSIBLY ESCAPE:

 

IF HE EXPLICITLY​​ OVERTURNS​​ THE ‘’THE LAW OF MOSES” –

JEWISH SHORTHAND AT THE TIME FOR​​ ALL​​ THE LAWS

CONTAINED IN THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES, SOME 613 OF THEM –

THE PHARISEES AND SCRIBES WILL ACCUSE HIM OF BLASPHEMY,

AND TURN HIM OVER TO THE ROMANS FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.

 

IF HE​​ UPHOLDS​​ THE LAW OF MOSES AND CONDEMNS THE WOMAN,

THE COMMON PEOPLE, THE GROUP FROM WHICH​​ 

MOST OF HIS FOLLOWERS COME FROM,

WILL JUDGE HIM TO BE​​ A LEGALIST ​​ 

LIKE​​ THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES AND LEAVE HIM IN DROVES.

 

THERE​​ SEEMS​​ TO BE​​ NO​​ WAY​​ OUT.

 

BUT JESUS​​ MAKES​​ A WAY OUT.

 

IF THE AMBUSH SET BY THE PHARISEES AND SCRIBES

WAS BRILLIANT, THE WAY IN WHICH JESUS TURNS

THEIR AMBUSH BACK ON THEM IS EVEN​​ MORE​​ BRILLIANT.

 

HE TAKES THEIR OVERWHELMING EMPHASIS ON SIN

AND USES IT AS A​​ FULCRUM​​ TO​​ OVERRIDE​​ PUNISHMENT​​ 

WITH FORGIVENESS AND LOVE:

 

JESUS’ IRONIC CHALLENGE --

“LET ANYONE AMONG YOU WHO IS​​ WITHOUT​​ SIN

BE THE​​ FIRST​​ TO THROW A STONE AT HER,”

 

LEADS DIRECTLY TO JESUS’ FORGIVING THE WOMAN –

“WOMAN, WHERE ARE THEY? ​​ HAS NO ONE CONDEMNED YOU?” . . .

“NEITHER DO I CONDEMN YOU.”

 

(WE INTERRUPT THIS SERMON TO BRING YOU​​ 

THE FOLLOWING BREAKING NEWS​​ 

WITH SOME IMPORTANT CONTEMPORARY IMPLICATIONS:

 

THIS PAST WEEK IN THE UNITED STATES A MINISTER​​ 

WHO CLAIMS THE NAME “CHRISTIAN” ADVOCATED

FOR THE PUBLIC EXECUTION OF WOMEN WHO REFUSE

TO OBEY THE COMMANDS OF THEIR HUSBANDS.

HE STATED THAT SUCH A MOVE WOULD SERVE

TO PUT WOMEN BACK IN THEIR PROPER PLACE.

 

ALSO THIS WEEK IN THE UNITED STATES,

TWO FUNDAMENTALIST MINISTERS CARRIED PLACARDS

AROUND A COLLEGE CAMPUS IN TEXAS PROCLAIMING THAT

“WOMEN ARE PROPERTY.”

 

THEY ADVOCATE TAKING AWAY THE RIGHT OF WOMEN TO VOTE.

 

WHAT​​ DO YOU THINK JESUS HIMSELF THINKS​​ 

ABOUT THESE EVENTS?)

 

TODAY WE WILL BE CONSIDERING THIS PASSAGE

IN THE​​ LARGER CONTEXT

OF HOW JESUS FULFILLS THE LAW OF LOVE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT.

 

IT IS WAY TOO SIMPLISTIC TO SAY

THAT THE OLD TESTAMENT WAS​​ HARSH​​ AND​​ JUDGMENTAL,

 

IN​​ CONTRAST​​ TO JESUS,

WHO WAS​​ COMPASSIONATE​​ AND​​ FORGIVING,

 

AND THAT JESUS’ COMPASSION AND FORGIVENESS

SIMPLY OVERTURN THE HARSHNESS AND CONDEMNATION

THAT WE FIND IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.

 

IF WE TAKE THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS SERIOUSLY​​ AS​​ A​​ WHOLE,

AND RESIST THE TEMPTATION TO​​ DISCARD​​ THOSE TEACHINGS

WHICH WE HAPPEN TO FIND​​ UNAPPEALING,

 

WE ARE FACED WITH THE CHALLENGE OF​​ RECONCILING

CERTAIN TEACHINGS OF JESUS

WHICH, ON​​ FACE​​ VALUE,​​ SEEM​​ TO​​ CONTRADICT​​ EACH OTHER.

 

FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT IN MATTHEW,

JESUS MAKES THE FOLLOWING BLANKET​​ AFFIRMATION

OF THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES:

 

“IF YOU THINK I’VE COME TO SET ASIDE THE LAW OF MOSES

OR THE WRITINGS OF THE PROPHETS, YOU’RE MISTAKEN.

I HAVE COME TO​​ BRING​​ TO​​ PERFECTION​​ 

ALL THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN.” ​​ (Matthew 5:17)

 

IN LIGHT OF THIS BLANKET​​ AFFIRMATION

OF OLD TESTAMENT LAW,

JESUS​​ SEEMS​​ TO BE ABOUT THE BUSINESS

OF​​ SETTING​​ ASIDE​​ THIS VERY LAW

IN TODAY’S READING FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN.

 

TO UNDO THIS SEEMING CONTRADICTION,

I NEED TO MAKE A FEW GENERAL COMMENTS

REGARDING BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION

AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO TESTAMENTS.

 

THE GIVING OF THE LAW WAS UNDERSTOOD BY THE ISRAELITES

TO BE A GREAT ACT OF​​ LOVE​​ ON GOD’S PART.

 

THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, FOR EXAMPLE,​​ 

WERE CONSIDERED TO BE TEN LIFE-GIVING,

LIFE-PROTECTING​​ “WORDS” FROM GOD TO GOD’S PEOPLE.

 

THEY PROVIDED A​​ FENCE, SO TO SPEAK,​​ 

BEYOND WHICH IT WAS DANGEROUS, EVEN FATAL, TO GO.

 

MANY OF THE LAWS RECORDED IN THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES

SEEM OVERLY HARSH TO US TODAY,

BUT IN THEIR OLD TESTAMENT CONTEXT​​ 

OF TRYING TO CREATE A STABLE AND JUST SOCIETY,

 

THEY CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AS WHERE GOD’S​​ LOVE

MET​​ GOD’S PEOPLE AT THAT​​ PARTICULAR​​ POINT IN​​ THEIR​​ HISTORY.

 

ANOTHER WAY OF PUTTING THIS WOULD BE TO SAY THAT

 

GODS​​ LAW,​​ WHICH​​ IS​​ ULTIMATELY​​ THE​​ LAW​​ OF​​ LOVE,

DOES​​ NOT​​ CHANGE.

 

BUT UNDER THE INSPIRATION OF GOD’S SPIRIT,

OUR​​ HUMAN​​ UNDERSTANDING​​ OF GOD’S LAW OF LOVE

DEVELOPS​​ AND​​ DEEPENS.

 

IN OTHER WORDS, WE COULD SAY

THAT OUR HUMAN UNDERSTANDING OF GOD’S LAW​​ EVOLVES.

 

(AGAIN, WE BRIEFLY INTERRUPT THIS SERMON​​ 

TO BRING YOU THE FOLLOWING:

 

ONE OF THE GREAT IRONIES OF THE HISTORY OF RELIGIONS

IS THAT THE FORM OF JUDAISM THAT JESUS CRITIQUED

SO STRONGLY IN HIS DAY HAS ITSELF EVOLVED

INTO A FAITH THAT IS MUCH CLOSER​​ 

TO THE TEACHINGS OF JESUS.

 

MUCH OF CHRISTIANITY, ON THE OTHER HAND,

INSISTS ON LOOKING BACKWARDS AND EMBRACING

THE HARSHEST ASPECTS OF OLD TESTAMENT LAW.

 

IT​​ ARGUES​​ THAT SINCE THESE LAWS ARE IN THE BIBLE

THEY STILL MUST BE OBEYED –

EVEN THOUGH JESUS HIMSELF​​ WENT OUT OF HIS WAY

TO REJECT THEM.

 

THEY WOULD LIKE TO TURN BACK THE CLOCK 3500 YEARS

AND RETURN TO THE MALE-DOMINATED PATRIARCHIAL

LAW CODES THAT KEPT WOMEN IN THEIR SUPPOSEDLY​​ 

PROPER PLACE.

 

WHAT WOULD THIS LOOK LIKE IF IMPLEMENTED?:

AMERICAN WOMEN WOULD EFFECTIVELY BECOME

THE PROPERTY OF THEIR HUSBANDS, MIRRORING

THE WAY WOMEN ARE NOW TREATED IN AFGANISTAN.)

 

MANY WOULD SAY THAT GOD’S DEEPEST AND HIGHEST

EXPRESSION OF LOVE WAS EMBODIED – INCARNATED –

IN THE PERSON OF JESUS OF NAZARETH.

 

BACK TO OUR QUESTION:

 

HOW, THEN, DOES JESUS​​ FULFILL​​ GOD’S LAW

WHEN HE​​ SEEMS​​ TO BE​​ SETTING​​ IT​​ ASIDE?

 

TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION

WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES THE FURTHER QUESTION:

“WHAT DOES FULFILLMENT​​ MEAN​​ IN THE CONTEXT​​ 

OF FULFILLING THE LAW?”

 

ARE WE LIMITED TO AN​​ EQUIVALENCY​​ DEFINITION OF FULFILLMENT,

IN WHICH​​ EACH​​ OF THE 613 COMMANDMENTS

RECORDED IN THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES MUST BE OBEYED EXACTLY?

 

OR CAN WE CLAIM A​​ PARADOXICAL​​ FULFILLMENT

OF ALL 613 COMMANDMENTS IN THE​​ PERSON​​ OF​​ JESUS​​ HIMSELF,

SPECIFICALLY IN THE​​ FORGIVENESS​​ THAT HE FREELY OFFERS?

 

IN PHRASING THE QUESTION THIS WAY

IT’S OBVIOUS THAT I THINK WHAT I’VE JUST CALLED

“PARADOXICAL FULFILLMENT” IS THE WAY TO GO.

 

I BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A STRONG PARALLEL HERE

WITH NEWTONIAN PHYSICS BEING PARADOXICALLY FULFILLED

IN QUANTUM PHYSICS.

 

QUANTUM PHYSICS DID NOT​​ NEGATE​​ 

THE TRUTH OF NEWTONIAN PHYSICS,​​ 

IT SIMPLY​​ SUBSUMED​​ THE TRUTH OF NEWTONIAN PHYSICS

INTO A​​ HIGHER​​ ORDER.

 

IN MUCH THE SAME WAY,

THE​​ LESSER​​ PERFECTION OF OLD TESTAMENT LAW

IS SUBSUMED INTO THE​​ HIGHER​​ PERFECTION

OF JESUS’ LAW OF LOVE.

 

IF THE ULTIMATE​​ PURPOSE​​ OF GOD’S LAW

WAS TO ENABLE PEOPLE TO LIVE TOGETHER IN​​ SHALOM​​ 

BY LIVING LIVES OF WHOLENESS AND INTEGRITY,​​ 

 

WE NEED TO ASK OURSELVES​​ HOW​​ THAT​​ SHALOM,

HOW​​ THAT FULLNESS OF LIFE WITH GOD, NEIGHBOR, AND SELF

ACTUALLY​​ COMES​​ INTO​​ BEING.

 

ONE OF THE GREAT INSIGHTS OF JESUS​​ ​​ 

IS THAT THE​​ LAW, IN AND OF ITSELF,​​ 

HAS​​ NO​​ POWER​​ TO BRING ABOUT ITS OWN FULFILLMENT.

 

JESUS CONTRASTS THIS POWERLESSNESS OF THE LAW

TO FULFILL ITSELF​​ ​​ 

WITH THE POWER THAT HE​​ GIVES TO THE WOMAN

IS OUR READING FROM JOHN’S GOSPEL WHEN JESUS SAYS TO HER:

 

“I CERTAINLY DON’T CONDEMN YOU EITHER.

GO, AND FROM NOW ON, BE​​ FREE​​ FROM A LIFE OF SIN.”

 

THINK BACK TO HOW I BEGAN THIS SERMON

WITH THE STORY OF HOW FINLAND OVERCAME

ITS PROBLEM WITH HOMELESSNESS:

 

IT SOLVED THE PROBLEM BY​​ GIVING ALL ITS HOMELESS PERSONS

A HOME​​ FIRST,

 

WHILE EVERYONE ELSE WAS PUTTING​​ 

THE FULFILLMENT OF ALL SORTS OF REQUIREMENTS​​ 

AS THE NECESSARY​​ CONDITION​​ OF EARNING A HOME.

 

THERE IS AN EXACT PARALLEL HERE​​ 

WITH WHAT JESUS HIMSELF DOES.

 

RELIGION TEACHES THAT FORGIVENESS MUST BE​​ EARNED.

THERE ARE CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS THAT MUST BE MET

BEFORE​​ FORGIVENESS CAN BE OFFERED.

 

JESUS DOES ANOTHER MASTERFUL MARTIAL ARTS MOVE HERE

AND FLIPS THIS WHOLE UNWORKABLE SYSTEM ON ITS HEAD.

 

HE OFFERS GOD’S FORGIVENESS​​ FIRST,

KNOWING​​ THAT THE REALITY OF GOD’S​​ 

UNCONDITIONAL LOVE AND FORGIVENESS

IS THE ONLY POWER IN THIS UNIVERSE

CAPABLE OF​​ EMPOWERING​​ A BROKEN PERSON

TO BEGIN OR BEGIN AGAIN A JOURNEY TOWARD WHOLENESS.

 

IN CASE AFTER CASE IN THE GOSPELS, JESUS OFFERS FORGIVENESS

WITH ABSOLUTELY NO STRINGS ATTACHED.

 

THE PERSON WHOM JESUS FORGIVES REMAINS​​ FREE​​ –

 

FREE TO EMBRACE THE HEALING REALITY OF GOD’S FORGIVENESS

AND TO BEGIN OR TO CONTINUE LIVING IN AND FROM​​ 

THE REALITY OF GOD’S LOVE –

 

OR​​ FREE TO PLAY GAMES WITH GOD’S LOVE AND FORGIVENESS,

SIMPLY GOING THROUGH THE MOTIONS OF

ACCEPTING GOD’S FORGIVENESS​​ WITH NO REAL INTENTION

OF ALLOWING GOD TO EMPOWER ONE TO CLEAN UP ONE’S ACT.

 

RETURNING TO OUR QUESTION OF​​ HOW​​ JESUS​​ FULFILLS,​​ 

OR​​ PERFECTS​​ THE 613 COMMANDMENTS IN THE OLD TESTAMENT,

 

THE ANSWER WOULD BE THAT HE FULFILLS AND PERFECTS THEM

BY GIVING PEOPLE THE​​ POWER​​ TO​​ LIVE​​ THEM,

 

AND THAT HE GIVES PEOPLE THE POWER TO​​ LIVE​​ THEM

BY GIVING THEM GOD’S​​ OWN​​ LOVE AND FORGIVENESS.

 

AND THE​​ RESPONSE​​ THAT JESUS HOPES FOR FROM US

AFTER RECEIVING GOD’S FORGIVENESS AND LOVE

IS NOT THAT OF BECOMING A “PERFECT” PERSON OVERNIGHT.

 

JESUS KNOWS HUMAN NATURE WELL ENOUGH TO KNOW​​ 

THAT MOST REAL CHANGE AND GROWTH IS NOT​​ IMMEDIATE,

BUT​​ GRADUAL.

 

JESUS IS SIMPLY REFLECTING THE UNCONDITIONAL NATURE

OF GOD’S OWN FORGIVENESS WHEN HE TELLS PETER

THAT HE MUST BE WILLING TO FORGIVE SOMEONE​​ 

WHO SINS AGAINST HIM NOT SEVEN TIMES,

BUT SEVENTY TIMES SEVEN TIMES – OR UNCONDITIONALLY,

JUST​​ LIKE​​ GOD. ​​ (See Matthew 18:21-22)

 

ST. CATHERINE OF SIENA IS SIMPLY ECHOING JESUS IN THE GOSPELS

WHEN SHE REMINDS US THAT​​ 

“FORGIVENESS IS THE​​ FOUNDATION​​ OF GOD’S BEING.”

 

WE CAN SAY THAT GOD’S​​ FORGIVENESS

IS THE DEEPEST AND HIGHEST​​ FULFILLMENT​​ OF GOD’S​​ LAW

 

BECAUSE GOD’S FORGIVENESS IS THE​​ ONLY​​ REALITY

CAPABLE OF EMPOWERING PEOPLE TO STRIVE TO​​ LIVE​​ GOD’S LAW,

WHICH, ULTIMATELY, IS THE LAW OF​​ LOVE.

 

OF COURSE THE LOVE WHICH​​ JESUS IS TALKING ABOUT​​ 

IS A LOVE THAT GOES WELL​​ BEYOND​​ SIMPLY​​ FEELING​​ GOOD

AND EMBRACES​​ UNCOMPROMISING,​​ UNCONDITIONAL​​ LOVE

TOWARD GOD, NEIGHBOR, AND SELF.

 

IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED OVER AND OVER AGAIN

THAT THE​​ THREAT​​ OF​​ REJECTION​​ AND​​ PUNISHMENT

DOES​​ NOTHING​​ TO HELP A PERSON CHANGE FOR THE​​ BETTER.

 

IN FACT, THIS PUNITIVE APPROACH DOES​​ EVERYTHING

TO HELP A PERSON CHANGE FOR THE​​ WORSE.

 

ON THE OTHER HAND, IT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED

OVER AND OVER AGAIN

THAT​​ LOVE​​ AND​​ FORGIVENESS​​ ARE THE TWO BEST​​ CATALYSTS

FOR PERSONAL​​ AND​​ SOCIETAL TRANSFORMATION.

 

MANY OF US UNDERSTAND JUST HOW​​ TRUE​​ THIS IS

FROM OUR OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE.

 

JESUS​​ UNDERSTOOD​​ THESE​​ DYNAMICS.

 

HE HAS THE​​ HIGHEST​​ RESPECT​​ FOR GOD’S LAW,

GOING SO FAR AS TO SAY

THAT HE DID NOT COME TO​​ REJECT​​ IT,​​ 

BUT TO​​ FULFILL, OR​​ PERFECT​​ IT.

 

BUT HE​​ ALSO​​ KNOWS​​ ​​ 

THAT THE LAW, IN AND OF ITSELF,​​ 

CANNOT​​ BRING ABOUT ITS OWN FULFILLMENT.

 

ONLY GOD’S LOVE AND FORGIVENESS

CAN​​ EMPOWER​​ A PERSON TO STRIVE TO LIVE GOD’S LAW,

A LAW WHICH IN ITSELF IS LIFE-GIVING AND GOOD.

 

ONE COULD GO SO FAR AS TO SAY​​ 

THAT THE MOST​​ CONCRETE​​ EXPRESSION OF GOD’S LOVE FOR US

IS​​ FORGIVENESS,

 

GIVEN THE FACT THAT WE HAVE​​ ALL​​ ALIENATED OURSELVES

FROM GOD, NEIGHBOR, AND SELF,

 

AND STAND DESPERATELY IN NEED OF FORGIVENESS,

WHICH IS JUST ANOTHER WORD FOR​​ RESTORATION.

 

BY NOT CONDEMNING THE WOMAN TAKEN IN ADULTERY,

JESUS IS SHOWING US THAT GOD’S DEEPEST WILL

IS NOT​​ REJECTION, BUT​​ LOVE,

NOT​​ PUNISHMENT, BUT​​ RESTORATION.

 

AMEN.

 

 

 

​​ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Independent and United Church of Christ