10-23

COMPASSION NOT LIMITED TO CERTAIN DAYS OF THE WEEK

Matthew 12:1-13  ​​ ​​​​ 

Rev. Paul Wrightman  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ 10/23/22

 

 

THE FOLLOWING IS A SERMON THAT PASTOR PAUL

GAVE BACK IN 2018. ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ ​​ 

 

A GREEK CLASS AT A PRESTIGIOUS SEMINARY

WAS GIVEN THE ASSIGNMENT TO STUDY THE STORY

OF THE GOOD SAMARITAN.

 

THE STUDENTS WERE TO DO AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS​​ 

OF THE BIBLICAL TEXT, OBSERVING AND COMMENTING

ON ALL THE MAJOR TERMS AND SYNTACTICAL FACTORS​​ 

WORTH MENTIONING.

 

EACH STUDENT WAS TO WRITE THEIR OWN TRANSLATION

AFTER HAVING FINISHED THEIR COMMENTARY.

 

AS IS TRUE IN MOST LANGUAGE CLASSES,

SEVERAL OF THE STUDENTS CARED MORE

ABOUT THE​​ PRACTICAL​​ IMPLICATIONS​​ OF THE ASSIGNMENT

THAN ITS INTELLECTUAL STIMULATION.

 

THE MORNING THE WORK WAS TO BE TURNED IN,

THREE GREEK STUDENTS TEAMED UP

AND CARRIED OUT A PLAN TO PROVE THEIR POINT.

 

ONE VOLUNTEERED TO PLAY THE PART OF THE​​ VICTIM.

 

THEY TORE HIS SHIRT AND PANTS, RUBBED MUD AND KETCHUP,

AND OTHER REALISTIC-LOOKING INGREDIENTS​​ 

TO SERVE AS "WOUNDS," AND MARKED UP HIS EYES, FACE, AND HAIR​​ ​​ 

SO THOROUGHLY THAT HE WAS NO LONGER RECOGNIZABLE.

THE VICTIM PLACED HIMSELF ALONG THE PATH

THAT LED FROM THE DORMS​​ TO THE GREEK CLASSROOM,

 

WHILE HIS TWO ACCOMPLICES HID AND WATCHED.

 

THE VICTIM GROANED AND THRASHED ABOUT,

SIMULATING GREAT PAIN.

 

NOT​​ ONE​​ STUDENT STOPPED.

 

THEY WALKED​​ AROUND​​ HIM, STEPPED​​ OVER​​ HIM,

AND​​ SAID​​ DIFFERENT THINGS TO HIM.

 

BUT NOBODY STOPPED TO​​ HELP.

(Adapted from a true story by Charles Swindoll in his book

The Tale of the Tardy Oxcart, p. 105.)

 

THERE IS A SAD AND DEADLY CONNECTION

BETWEEN THIS​​ CONTEMPORARY​​ INCIDENT

AND THE INCIDENT DESCRIBED IN TODAY'S SCRIPTURE READING.

 

THAT SAD AND DEADLY CONNECTION IS THIS:

 

IN BOTH CASES,​​ LEADERS​​ OF THE​​ RELIGIOUS​​ ESTABLISHMENT

FAIL​​ TO​​ RESPOND​​ TO SOMEONE IN​​ NEED.

 

IN THE EXAMPLE FROM OUR OWN DAY,

THOSE​​ FUTURE CHURCH​​ MINISTERS​​ MIGHT VERY WELL BE GETTING

AN "A" IN BIBLICAL GREEK,

 

BUT FAILED​​ MISERABLY IN ACTUALLY LIVING OUT THE MEANING

OF THE PARABLE THAT THEY​​ WERE STUDYING.

 

IN THE EXAMPLE FROM JESUS' DAY,

CERTAIN PHARISEES TAKE ISSUE WITH HIS HEALING ON THE SABBATH,

AND WANT TO FORBID JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES FROM DOING SO.

 

THE COMMANDMENT TO HONOR THE SABBATH AND KEEP IT HOLY --

ONE OF THE ORIGINAL TEN COMMANDMENTS --

 

WAS STATED IN THE MOST​​ GENERAL​​ OF TERMS.

 

TO BE SURE, WORK WAS NOT ALLOWED ON THE SABBATH,

BUT THE MEANING OF "WORK" WAS LEFT​​ UNDEFINED.

 

THIS WAS DONE​​ ON​​ PURPOSE​​ SO THAT CERTAIN LEGALISTIC TYPES

WOULDN'T GET CARRIED AWAY IN COMING UP WITH THEIR​​ OWN

NARROW DEFINITIONS OF WHAT HONORING THE SABBATH MEANT.

 

SO,​​ WHAT​​ HAPPENED​​ TO THE ORIGINAL OPEN-ENDEDNESS

OF THE SABBATH COMMANDMENT?

 

YOU GUESSED IT --

CERTAIN LEGALISTIC TYPES​​ DID​​ GET​​ CARRIED AWAY IN COMING UP

WITH THEIR OWN NARROW DEFINITIONS​​ 

OF WHAT HONORING THE SABBATH​​ WAS ALL ABOUT.

 

BY JESUS' DAY SOME OF THESE RELIGIOUS FANATICS

HAD PILED ON SO MANY​​ ADDITIONAL​​ LAWS​​ 

CONCERNING WHAT​​ COULD​​ AND COULD​​ NOT

BE DONE ON THE SABBATH THAT THE DISCIPLES OF JESUS,

 

IN PLUCKING AND EATING GRAIN ON THE SABBATH,

 

WERE CONSIDERED GUILY OF BREAKING NOT JUST​​ ONE, BUT​​ FOUR

IMPORTANT​​ SABBATH LAWS:

 

BY​​ PLUCKING​​ THE CORN THEY WERE GUILTY OF​​ REAPING;

BY​​ RUBBING​​ IT IN THEIR HANDS THEY WERE GUILTY OF​​ THRESHING;

BY​​ SEPARATING​​ THE GRAIN AND THE CHAFF

THEY WERE GUILT OF​​ WINNOWING;

AND BY THIS WHOLE PROCESS, THEY WERE GUILTY

OF​​ PREPARING​​ A​​ MEAL​​ ON THE SABBATH.

(William Barclay,​​ The Gospel of Matthew,​​ Volume Two, p. 26.)

 

JESUS DOES NOT HESITATE TO​​ CHALLENGE​​ AND TO​​ CORRECT

THESE​​ ORAL​​ ADDITIONS​​ TO THE​​ WRITTEN​​ LAW ON THE SABBATH

CONTAINED IN THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.

 

HE CITES THE EXAMPLE OF KING DAVID IN THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES,

WHO BROKE THE LITERAL LAW​​ STATING THAT ONLY THE PRIESTS

WERE ALLOWED TO EAT THE SACRED BREAD IN THE TABERNACLE.

 

DAVID'S FOLLOWERS WERE HUNGRY, SO THEY ATE,​​ 

AND WITH DAVID'S BLESSING, AND PROBABLY PARTICIPATION.

 

JESUS THEN​​ CITES THE EXAMPLE​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ 

OF THE TEMPLE PRIESTS IN JERUSALEM

CONTINUING TO OFFER SACRIFICES ON THE SABBATH,

 

EVEN THOUGH THE ACT OF MAKING THE SACRIFICE

WAS OFFICIALLY CONSIDERED TO BE "WORK."

 

THEN JESUS -- IN A BREATHTAKING DEMONSTRATION

OF HOW AT-EASE HE WAS WITH HIS OWN AUTHORITY --

 

ARGUES FROM THE LESSER TO THE GREATER

BY STATING THAT SOMEONE FAR GREATER ​​ 

THAN THE TEMPLE PRIESTS, THE TEMPLE SACRIFICES,

OR THE TEMPLE ITSELF WAS STANDING IN THEIR MIDST. ​​ 

 

IN DOING SO, HE IS MAKING THE AMAZING CLAIM

THAT HE IS "LORD OF THE SABBATH,"

 

THAT HE HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE

WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE ON THE SABBATH.

 

BY QUOTING THE PROPHET HOSEA THAT GOD DESIRES

"MERCY​​ AND NOT​​ SACRIFICE," ​​​​ (Hosea 6:6)

JESUS MAKES IT UNMISTAKABLY CLEAR

WHAT HE CONSIDERS GOD'S​​ OWN PRIORITIES TO BE,

 

AND THAT GOD'S OWN PRIORITIES LIE DISTINCTLY​​ 

IN THE DIRECTION OF HUMAN​​ NEEDS​​ TAKING​​ PRECEDENCE

OVER​​ RITUAL LAWS.

 

IN TODAY'S GOSPEL, JESUS IS UNEQUIVOCALLY TEACHING

THAT IF RITUAL LAW CONFLICTS WITH HUMAN NEED,

WE GO WITH THE​​ NEED​​ AND NOT WITH THE​​ LAW.

 

ACCORDING TO MANY OF THE PHARISEES OF JESUS' DAY,

IT WAS CLEARLY​​ AGAINST​​ THE LAW FOR A PERSON​​ 

TO RESCUE A SHEEP ON THE SABBATH.

 

HE REFERS TO THIS NO-PULLING-OUT-SHEEP-FROM-PITS-

ON-THE-SABBATH LAW, ONLY TO TRASH IT:

 

"SUPPOSE ONE OF YOU HAS A SHEEP AND IT FALLS INTO A PIT

ON THE SABBATH; WILL YOU NOT LAY HOLD OF IT AND LIFT IT OUT?"

 

HERE JESUS IS IMPLICITLY ACKNOWLEDGING

THE​​ COMMON-SENSE​​ WISDOM OF THE PEASANTS

AND SHEPHERDS WHOM HE KNEW SO WELL --

 

THE​​ NEED​​ OF THAT SHEEP​​ OUTWEIGHS​​ THE REACH​​ 

OF THE SABBATH LAW.

 

AND AGAIN ARGUING FROM THE LESSER TO THE GREATER,

JESUS GOES ON TO STATE​​ 

"HOW MUCH​​ MORE​​ VALUABLE​​ IS A HUMAN BEING THAN A SHEEP."

 

IN OTHER WORDS, IF THE NEED OF A​​ SHEEP​​ 

TO BE PULLED OUT OF A PIT OUTWEIGHS THE RITUAL LAW,

 

HOW MUCH​​ MORE​​ DOES THE NEED​​ 

OF A HUMAN BEING FOR​​ HEALING​​ OUTWEIGH RITUAL LAW.

 

I INVITE YOU TO​​ COMPARE​​ AND​​ CONTRAST​​ 

THE BLATANT ​​ DISREGARD​​ FOR THE NEED​​ 

OF A FELLOW HUMAN BEING DEMONSTRATED​​ 

BY THAT GREEK SEMINARY CLASS

 

WITH THE FOLLOWING FROM ANDREW DAVISON,

A​​ RETIRED​​ PROFESSOR AT COLGATE-ROCHESTER SEMINARY​​ ​​ ​​ 

WHO WRITES:

 

"DR. ALBERT SCHWEITZER WAS EIGHTY-FIVE YEARS OLD

WHEN I VISITED HIS JUNGLE HOSPITAL AT LAMBARENE,

ON THE BANKS OF THE OGOWE RIVER.

 

YOU CAN IMAGINE THE DEEP AND PROFOUND EFFECT​​ 

OF THAT THREE-DAY VISIT, WHICH INCLUDED OPPORTUNITY

FOR SOME LEISURELY CONVERSATION​​ 

WITH THAT GREAT HUMANITARIAN.

 

BUT ONE EVENT STANDS OUT IN A SPECIAL WAY.

 

IT WAS ABOUT ELEVEN IN THE MORNING.

 

THE EQUATORIAL SUN WAS BEATING DOWN MERCILESSLY,

AND WE WERE WALKING UP A HILL WITH DR. SCHWEITZER.

 

SUDDENLY HE LEFT US AND STRODE ACROSS THE SLOPE OF THE HILL

TO A PLACE WHERE AN AFRICAN WOMAN​​ 

WAS STRUGGLING UPWARD WITH A HUGE ARMLOAD OF WOOD

FOR THE COOKFIRES.

 

I WATCHED WITH BOTH ADMIRATION AND CONCERN

AS THE EIGHTY-FIVE-YEAR-OLD MAN​​ 

TOOK THE ENTIRE LOAD OF WOOD

AND CARRIED IT ON UP THE HILL FOR THE RELIEVED WOMAN.

 

WHEN WE ALL REACHED THE TOP OF THE HILL,

ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF OUR GROUP ASKED DR. SCHWEITZER

WHY HE DID THINGS LIKE THAT, IMPLYING THAT IN THAT HEAT

AND AT HIS AGE HE SHOULD NOT.

 

ALBERT SCHWEITZER, LOOKING RIGHT AT ALL OF US

AND POINTING TO THE WOMAN, SAID SIMPLY,

"NO ONE SHOULD EVER HAVE TO CARRY​​ 

A BURDEN LIKE THAT ALONE."

(Illustrations Unlimited, p. 119.)

 

I THINK THIS ONE LINER BY DR. SCHWEITZER,

 

"NO​​ ONE​​ SHOULD EVER HAVE TO CARRY

A BURDEN LIKE THAT​​ ALONE,"

 

IS ONE OF THE BEST SHORT DESCRIPTIONS​​ 

OF THE REASON FOR JESUS AND HIS MINISTRY

THAT I'VE EVER HEARD.

 

IT IS CLEARLY THE SENTIMENT OF JESUS HIMSELF

WHEN HE TELLS US THAT "INASMUCH AS YOU HAVE DONE IT

FOR ONE OF THE​​ LEAST​​ OF THESE​​ BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF MINE,

YOU HAVE DONE IT FOR ME." ​​ (Matthew 25:40)

 

LEO TOLSTOY FLESHES-OUT THIS SOLIDARITY OF JESUS

WITH THE DOWN-AND-OUT​​ IN HIS FAMOUS SHORT STORY

FEATURING THE SHOEMAKER MARTIN AVDEITCH:

 

ONE NIGHT MARTIN AVEDITCH, A HUMBLE SHOEMAKER,

DOZING OVER HIS OPEN BIBLE, SEEMED TO HEAR A VOICE SAYING:

 

"MARTIN, LOOK THOU INTO THE STREET TOMORROW,

FOR I AM COMING TO VISIT THEE."

 

CONVINCED THAT THE LORD JESUS WAS GOING TO VISIT HIM,

MARTIN AWOKE THE NEXT MORNING WITH NERVOUS EXCITEMENT.

 

BUT NO ONE SHOWED UP THAT DAY EXCEPT A SUCCESSION

OF PENNILESS AND PITIFUL SOULS:

 

AN AGED VETERAN, A SHIVERING MOTHER AND NEWBORN,

AN​​ OLD PEDDLER WOMAN AND A FRIGHTENED BOY

WHO HAD FILCHED ONE OF HER APPLES.

 

WITH A KIND HEART, MARTIN CARED FOR EACH PERSON,

BUT AS EVENING FELL, HE WAS DISAPPOINTED

THAT JESUS HAD NOT VISITED THAT DAY.

 

PUTTING ON HIS SPECTACLES, HE TOOK UP HIS BIBLE WITH A SIGH,

AND IT OPENED TO MATTHEW, CHAPTER 25.

 

MARTIN READ: "FOR I WAS HUNGRY AND YOU GAVE ME FOOD;

I WAS THIRSTY AND YOU GAVE ME DRINK;

I WAS A STRANGER AND YOU TOOK ME IN."

 

"LORD, WHEN DID WE DO THESE THINGS?"

 

LOOKING ON DOWN THE PAGE, MARTIN READ:

 

"TRULY, TRULY I SAY TO YOU, INASMUCH AS YOU DID IT

FOR ONE OF THE LEAST OF THESE MY BRETHREN,

YOU DID IT TO ME."

 

TOLSTOY CONCLUDES BY SAYING:

 

"THEN MARTIN AVEDEITCH UNDERSTOOD THAT THE VISION

HAD COME TRUE, AND THAT HIS SAVIOR HAD IN VERY TRUTH

VISITED HIM THAT DAY, AND THAT HE HAD RECEIVED HIM."

(Nelson's Complete Book of Stories, Illustrations, and Quotes, p. 511.)

 

GIVEN THE EXTREMELY CHALLENGING TIMES​​ 

WHICH WE'RE GOING THROUGH AS A NATION,

 

I'M BEING ASKED MORE AND MORE

WHAT I THINK IS A GOOD RULE-OF-THUMB​​ 

BY WHICH TO​​ NAVIGATE​​ THESE​​ IMPOSSIBLE​​ TIMES

SPECIFICALLY AS A CHRISTIAN, A FOLLOWER OF CHRIST.

 

A GUIDELINE WHICH I HAVE PERSONALLY FOUND VERY HELPFUL​​ 

IS TO ASK MYSELF THE QUESTION "WHAT WOULD​​ JESUS​​ DO?"

 

IN OTHER WORDS, BASED ON EVERYTHING​​ 

THAT WE​​ KNOW ABOUT JESUS IN THE GOSPELS,

 

BASED ON HOW JESUS RESPONDED TO PEOPLE BACK THEN,

 

HOW WOULD JESUS HAVE ME RESPOND TO PEOPLE RIGHT NOW?

​​ 

I HAVE ADDED A​​ SECOND​​ QUESTION:

 

"WHAT WOULD JESUS​​ ASK?"

 

IN OTHER WORDS, GIVEN ANY OF THE MULTITUDE OF

PROBLEMATIC SITUATIONS IN WHICH OUR COUNTRY

FINDS ITSELF IN TODAY, WHAT WOULD JESUS ASK​​ 

ABOUT THAT SITUATION, AND PERHAPS MORE IMPORTANTLY,

 

"WHAT WOULD JESUS ASK ABOUT THE​​ PERSON​​ OR​​ PERSONS

CALLING THE SHOTS IN THAT SITUATION?"

 

IN THE CONTEXT OF PREPARING THIS SERMON,

I FOUND A​​ THIRD​​ GUAGE BY WHICH TO MEASURE A SITUATION,

AND THE PERSON OR PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING

THAT SITUATION.

 

THAT THIRD GAGUE IS ALBERT SCHWEITZER'S STATEMENT:

 

"NO ONE SHOULD EVER HAVE TO CARRY​​ 

A BURDEN LIKE THAT ALONE."

 

IS SOMEONE CREATING IMPOSSIBLE BURDENS​​ 

FOR OTHERS TO CARRY?

 

LEARNING FROM JESUS IN TODAY'S SCRIPTURE READING,

WHEN WE BECOME AWARE THAT SOMEONE​​ IS​​ CREATING

IMPOSSIBLE BURDENS FOR OTHERS TO CARRY,

 

THE JESUS-LIKE RESPONSE WOULD BE TWOFOLD: ​​ 

 

FIRST, TO​​ OPPOSE

THAT PERSON WITH ALL THE RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO ONE --

 

JESUS AS JESUS OPPOSED CERTAIN OF THE PHARISEES.

 

AND​​ SECOND, IT WOULD BE TO​​ HELP​​ THE PERSON

WITH THE IMPOSSIBLE BURDEN TO​​ CARRY​​ THAT BURDEN,

 

JUST AS ALBERT SCHWEITZER HELPED THE AFRICAN WOMAN

TO CARRY HER LOAD OF WOOD.

 

IN CLOSING, I'D LIKE TO SHARE WITH YOU THE FOLLOWING

BY TED ENGSTROM IN HIS BOOK​​ THE PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE.

 

HE WRITES:

 

"I WAS CLEANING OUT A DESK DRAWER WHEN I FOUND

A FLASHLIGHT I HADN'T USED IN OVER A YEAR.

 

I FLIPPED THE SWITCH BUT WASN'T SURPRISED

WHEN IT GAVE NO LIGHT.

 

I UNSCREWED IT AND SHOOK IT TO GET THE BATTERIES OUT,

BUT THEY WOULDN'T BUDGE.

 

FINALLY, AFTER SOME EFFORT, THEY CAME LOOSE.

 

WHAT A MESS!

 

BATTERY ACID HAD CORRODED​​ 

THE ENTIRE INSIDE OF THE FLASHLIGHT.

 

THE BATTERIES WERE NEW WHEN I'D PUT THEM IN,

AND I'D STORED THEM IN A SAFE, WARM PLACE.

 

BUT THERE WAS ONE PROBLEM.

 

THOSE BATTERIES WEREN'T MADE TO BE WARM AND COMFORTABLE.

 

THEY WERE DESIGNED TO BE TURNED ON -- TO BE USED."

 

ENGSTROM CONCLUDES:

 

"IT'S THE SAME WITH US.

 

WE WEREN'T CREATED TO BE WARM, SAFE, AND COMFORTABLE.

 

YOU AND I WERE MADE TO BE "TURNED ON" --​​ 

TO PUT OUR LOVE TO WORK,

 

TO APPLY OUR PATIENCE IN DIFFICULT, TRYING SITUATIONS --

TO LET OUR LIGHT SHINE."

 

AMEN.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ​​​​ 

 

 

Independent and United Church of Christ