8-27

THE SECOND OF THE BIG TEN: ​​ TRUE WORSHIP

Exodus 20:3-5b  ​​ ​​ ​​​​ 

Rev. Paul Wrightman  ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​ 8/27/23 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​  ​​​​ ​​ ​​ 

 

 

WE CONTINUE OUR SERMON SERIES ON THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

FOLLOWING THE LEAD OF THE JEWISH TRADITION,

WHICH SEES THEM AS TEN FOUNDATIONAL​​ WORDS​​ OF​​ LIFE,

RATHER THAN AS TEN FOUNDATIONAL​​ LAWS.

 

THE​​ DIFFERENCE​​ BETWEEN JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN APPROACHES

TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS IS​​ ESPECIALLY​​ SIGNIFICANT

CONCERNING​​ TODAYS​​ SCRIPTURE​​ LESSON.

 

HISTORICALLY,​​ THE​​ CHRISTIAN​​ TRADITION​​ ​​ 

HAS SEEN TODAY'S BIBLE READING

AS COMPRISING THE FIRST​​ TWO​​ COMMANDMENTS.

 

THUS, CHRISTIANITY​​ REGARDS THE​​ FIRST​​ SENTENCE

OF TODAY’S TEXT AS THE​​ FIRST​​ COMMANDMENT:

 

“YOU SHALL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME,”

(Exodus 20:3)

 

AND THE​​ SECOND​​ SENTENCE OF TODAY’S TEXT

AS THE​​ SECOND​​ COMMANDMENT:

 

“YOU SHALL NOT MAKE FOR YOURSELF A GRAVEN IMAGE…”

(Exodus 20:4)

 

JUDAISM, WITH ITS EMPHASIS ON​​ LIFE-GIVING​​ WORDS

RATHER THAN​​ COMMANDMENTS,

UNDERSTANDS TODAY’S READING FROM EXODUS

AS A​​ SINGLE​​ INSTRUCTION FROM GOD,

 

THAT SINGLE INSTRUCTION BEING

TO PUT GOD​​ FIRST.

 

THE JEWISH TRADITION​​ ASSUMES​​ THAT PUTTING GOD FIRST

PRESUPPOSES​​ NOT MAKING GRAVEN IMAGES, OR​​ IDOLS,

OF​​ OTHER​​ GODS​​ AND WORSHIPING OR SERVING​​ THEM.

 

FOR JUDAISM, THE FIRST,​​ ALL-IMPORTANT​​ COMMANDMENT,

THE FIRST​​ WORD​​ OF​​ LIFE​​ FROM GOD,

 

THE WORD​​ FROM​​ WHICH​​ ALL THE​​ REST​​ OF GOD’S WORDS​​ FLOW,

IS GOD’S​​ SELF-DESCRIPTION​​ IN EXODUS 20:2, ​​ 

 

“I AM THE LORD YOUR GOD,

WHO BROUGHT YOU​​ OUT​​ OF THE LAND OF EGYPT,

OUT​​ OF THE HOUSE OF​​ SLAVERY.”

 

THUS, WHAT FOR​​ CHRISTIANITY​​ UNTIL RECENTLY​​ 

WAS CONSIDERED TO BE MERELY

AN​​ INTRODUCTORY​​ PREFACE TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS --

 

THE COMMANDMENTS THEMSELVES​​ 

BEING MUCH MORE IMPORTANT THAN THEIR INTRODUCTION --

 

IS IN​​ JUDAISM​​ THE​​ HEART​​ OF THE MATTER.

 

IT IS THE HEART OF THE MATTER

BECAUSE IT SHOWS THAT GOD GIVES​​ GODS​​ VERY​​ SELF

AS THE​​ FIRST​​ LIFE-GIVING WORD.

 

“I AM THE LORD YOUR GOD,

WHO BROUGHT YOU​​ OUT​​ OF THE LAND OF EGYPT,

OUT​​ OF THE HOUSE OF​​ SLAVERY,”

 

IS​​ THE​​ PRIMAL,​​ ALL-IMPORTANT​​ WORD,

FROM WHICH​​ ALL​​ THE​​ REST​​ OF GOD’S WORDS​​ FOLLOW.

 

MANY CONTEMPORARY CHRISTIAN​​ 

BIBLICAL SCHOLARS AND THEOLOGIANS

AGREE​​ WITH THE JEWISH TRADITION ON THIS POINT,

 

AND ARGUE​​ THAT​​ TURNING THE FIRST WORD

INTO A MERE​​ INTRODUCTION

 

HAS SEVERELY​​ WEAKENED​​ THE MORAL FORCE

OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS​​ 

 

BY CUTTING THEM OFF FROM THEIR​​ SOURCE​​ IN GOD.

 

IN HEBREW, THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT​​ ECHO

FROM EXODUS 20:2,

WHICH MENTIONS GOD BRINGING THE PEOPLE​​ 

OUT OF THE HOUSE OF​​ SLAVERY,

 

AND EXODUS 20:5,​​ 

PART OF THE TEXT WE ARE LOOKING AT TODAY,

WHICH FORBIDS US TO WORSHIP OR​​ SERVE​​ OTHER GODS.

 

IN HEBREW THE WORDS​​ SLAVERY​​ AND​​ SERVE​​ 

SHARE THE SAME​​ ROOT.

 

THE IMPLICATION IS THAT​​ SERVING​​ OTHER GODS

CAN ONLY LEAD TO​​ SLAVERY.

 

MOST OF US KNOW​​ THE STORY OF HOW THE PEOPLE OF THE EXODUS,

WHILE MOSES WAS UP ON MT. SINAI COMMUNING WITH GOD

AND RECEIVING FROM GOD THE TEN LIFE-GIVING WORDS,

WHICH WE KNOW AS THE TEN COMMANDMENTS;

​​ 

GREW WEARY OF WAITING​​ 

AND HAD MOSES’ BROTHER, AARON,

MAKE FOR THEM A CALF OUT OF GOLD.

 

THEY THEN PROCEEDED TO PROCLAIM THIS GOLDEN CALF  ​​ ​​​​ 

THE GOD WHO HAD LED THEM FORTH FROM EGYPT ​​ 

AND WORSHIPPED IT IN A FRENZY​​ OF BOOZE AND SEX.

​​ 

THE HUGE AND TRAGIC​​ IRONY​​ TAKING PLACE HERE

IS THAT THIS GOLDEN CALF IS MERELY A​​ COPY

OF ONE OF THE MANY FERTILITY GODS WORSHIPPED IN EGYPT.

 

BARELY A COUPLE OF MONTHS HAD PASSED

SINCE THEIR LIBERATION FROM SLAVERY IN EGYPT

BEFORE THE PEOPLE ARE BUSY​​ RE-ENSLAVING​​ THEMSELVES,

 

BOWING DOWN TO AND SERVING A GOD,​​ 

NAMELY SEX AND FERTILITY,

WHO IS MUCH MORE​​ CONCRETE,​​ TOUCHABLE,​​ 

AND SEEMINGLY “REAL,”​​ 

 

THAN THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, ISAAC, JACOB, AND MOSES,

WHO FLAT-OUT REFUSES TO ALLOW

ANY​​ IMAGES OF “HIMSELF” TO BE MADE.

 

THE PEOPLE SIMPLY CANNOT​​ HANDLE​​ 

THIS UNREPRESENTABLE GOD OF LIBERATION

AND THE RADICAL​​ FREEDOM​​ AND​​ WHOLENESS

OF THIS GOD’S TEN LIFE-GIVING WORDS.

 

THERE IS SOMETHING IN HUMAN NATURE

THAT, LEFT TO ITSELF, WINDS UP IN SELF-DESTRUCTION.

 

MUCH OF THE HISTORY OF ISRAEL,

AND MUCH OF OUR OWN HISTORY AS WELL,

CAN BE READ AS THE​​ REJECTION​​ OF THIS GOD OF LIBERATION

AND THE MAKING OF VARIOUS IDOLS TO​​ TAKE THE PLACE OF,

TO STAND-IN FOR​​ THIS GOD WHO DEMANDS​​ 

NOTHING LESS THAN​​ BEING​​ FIRST​​ IN ALL ASPECTS OF LIFE. ​​ 

 

WE THINK OF IDOLS

MADE OUT OF GOLD OR SILVER OR WOOD OR CLAY

TO BE HOPELESSLY PRIMITIVE AND BENEATH CONTEMPT.

 

CERTAINLY​​ WE​​ ARE NOT TO BE CAUGHT-OUT

WORSHIPPING SUCH SIMPLE-MINDED SUPERSTITUTIONS.

 

IN THINKING THIS WAY,

WE FAIL TO TAKE IDOLATRY SERIOUSLY​​ ENOUGH.

 

ANCIENT PEOPLES WERE NOT, AFTER ALL,

STUPID OR SIMPLE-MINDED.

​​ 

THE GOLD OR SILVER OR WOOD OR CLAY CARVING

WAS SIMPLY THE​​ OUTWARD​​ REPRESENTATION

OF AN​​ UNDERLYING​​ REALITY, AN​​ UNDERLYING​​ POWER

THAT​​ CRIED​​ OUT​​ TO BE​​ APPEASED,​​ 

THAT​​ CRIED​​ OUT​​ TO BE​​ WORSHIPPED.

 

THUS, IT WAS NOT SO MUCH THE GOLDEN CALF AS​​ OBJECT

THAT WAS WORSHIPPED,

 

BUT THE GOLDEN CALF AS​​ SYMBOL​​ OF SEX AND FERTILITY

THAT WAS WORSHIPPED.

 

THROUGHOUT ITS HISTORY ISRAEL DEVELOPED​​ 

A HUGE​​ INVENTORY​​ OF IDOLS,

ALL OF THEM​​ BORROWED​​ FROM ITS NEIGHBORS.

 

IN ADDITION TO SEX AND FERTILITY,​​ 

WE FIND IDOLS TO WEALTH, HEALTH, BEAUTY,

GOOD WEATHER, INTOXICATION, AND MILITARY MIGHT.

 

DOESN’T​​ THIS LIST SOUND DISQUIETINGLY​​ FAMILIAR?

 

WE MAY BE TOO SOPHISTICATED TO MAKE  ​​​​ 

ACTUAL OUTWARD REPRESENTATIONS

OF THE UNDERLYING REALITIES WE WORSHIP,

 

BUT THE LIST OF UNDERLYING REALITIES

REMAINS BASICALLY THE​​ SAME,

EXCEPT THAT​​ OUR​​ LIST HAS GOTTEN​​ BIGGER.

 

IN ADDITION TO THE BASICS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD,

WE HAVE​​ ADDED​​ EDUCATION, SPORTS, CAREERS,​​ 

FAMILY, COUNTRY,​​ CONTROL,​​ AND​​ COMFORT INTO THE MIX.

 

WHILE NONE OF THESE THINGS IS BAD IN AND OF ITSELF –

 

INDEED, ALL ARE​​ BLESSINGS​​ IN THEIR PROPER PLACE –

 

EACH OF THESE THINGS​​ CAN​​ BECAME AN​​ IDOL, AN​​ END-IN-ITSELF

USURPING​​ THE RIGHTFUL PLACE OF​​ GOD.

 

ONE OF THE BASIC​​ REALITIES OF LIFE

IS THAT WE PUT IN​​ FIRST​​ PLACE

SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE​​ SECOND, THIRD, OR EVEN FOURTH,

WE UNLEASH POWERFUL FORCES​​ 

OF SELF-DESTRUCTION UPON OURSELVES.

 

A WISE PERSON HAS WRITTEN:

 

“I THINK THAT PART OF THE​​ ATTRACTION​​ OF IDOLS

IS THAT WE​​ KNOW​​ THEY ARE​​ NOT​​ GOD.

 

SO WE COME UP WITH SOMETHING

WE ARE WILLING TO GIVE OURSELVES TO​​ 

AS A MEANS TO DEAL WITH THE PAIN, INSECURITY, AND FEAR

THAT WE LIVE WITH,

 

BUT​​ WHICH WE THINK WE CAN STILL​​ CONTROL.”

(Sean Gladding,​​ Ten, p. 216.)

 

LET’S LOOK AT ONE COMMON-ENOUGH EXAMPLE: ALCOHOL.

HERE IS ONE PERSON’S FIRST-PERSON ACCOUNT:

 

“LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT AN IDOL I USED TO HAVE.

OH, I DIDN’T​​ CALL​​ IT THAT, BUT THAT’S WHAT IT​​ WAS.

 

I STARTED DRINKING [WHEN I WAS IN HIGH SCHOOL]

AS A WAY TO COPE WITH THE​​ PAIN​​ I FELT

BECAUSE OF SOME THINGS THAT HAPPENED WHEN I WAS A KID.

 

ALCOHOL KEPT ME COMFORTABLY​​ NUMB​​ 

AND GOT ME THROUGH HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE.

 

THEN WHEN I BEGAN TO SUCCEED IN BUSINESS,

I BUILT AN​​ ALTAR​​ TO THAT IDOL – A LITTLE​​ HOME​​ FOR HIM –

A REALLY NICE WET BAR.

 

AND I​​ WORSHIPED​​ AT THAT ALTAR EVERY NIGHT.

 

I BECAME WILLING TO MAKE​​ SACRIFICES​​ TO AND FOR THAT IDOL –

 

AS LONG AS IT DEALT WITH MY PAIN,

I WAS WILLING TO GIVE UP ANYTHING FOR IT.

 

ALCOHOL BECAME​​ MORE​​ IMPORTANT​​ TO​​ ME

THAN FRIENDSHIPS, FAMILY, EMPLOYMENT, EVEN MY HEALTH.

 

…I THOUGHT​​ I​​ COULD​​ CONTROL​​ MY LITTLE GOD,

BUT EVENTUALLY​​ IT​​ TOOK CONTROL OF​​ ME.”

(Sean Gladding,​​ Ten, p. 216.)

 

ALCOHOL, OF​​ COURSE, IS SIMPLY​​ ONE​​ OF A​​ MULTITUDE

OF SUBSTANCES, ATTITUDES, ACCOMPLISHMENTS, HOBBIES,

GOALS, SPORTS, CAREERS, CELEBRITIES, AND FEELING-STATES

THAT WE​​ CAN​​ TURN INTO IDOLS AND BECOME ADDICTED TO.

 

GIVEN THE PRESSURE THAT CONTEMPORARY WESTERN CULTURE,

BOTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN,

PUTS ON PEOPLE TO​​ BECOME​​ ADDICTS IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER,

 

SOME VERY WISE SPIRITUAL DIRECTORS,

SUCH AS HENRI NOUWEN AND RICHARD ROHR,

 

CLAIM THAT​​ ALL​​ OF US,​​ ​​ 

SIMPLY BY LIVING IN A SOCIETY

THAT IS INSATIABLE IN ITS DEMAND FOR PEOPLE

TO WORSHIP ITS IDOLS;

 

CLAIM THAT ALL OF US​​ ARE, IF NOT ACTUAL ADDICTS,

HAVE, AT THE VERY LEAST, ADDICTIVE TENDENCIES.

 

I’D LIKE TO CLOSE THIS SERMON WITH AN EXTENDED METAPHOR,

OR ILLUSTRATION, WHICH I'VE USED BEFORE,​​ 

BUT IN A DIFFERENT CONTEXT FROM THAT IN WHICH

I'M USING IT TODAY.

 

AT A FAMOUS BUSINESS SCHOOL

A PROFESSOR DELIVERED AN EXTRAORDINARY LECTURE

ON SOCIAL ECONOMICS TO HIS GRADUATE CLASS.

 

WITHOUT EXPLAINING WHAT HE WAS DOING,

THE PROFESSOR CAREFULLY PLACED A LARGE GLASS JAR ON HIS DESK.

 

THEN, IN VIEW OF HIS STUDENTS,​​ 

HE BROUGHT OUT A BAG FULL OF STONES

AND PLACED THEM ONE BY ONE IN THE JAR,

BEGINNING WITH THE LARGEST,

UNTIL NO MORE STONES WOULD FIT IN.

 

HE ASKED HIS STUDENTS, “IS THE JAR FULL?”

 

“YES,” THEY RESPONDED.

 

THE PROFESSOR SMILED.

 

FROM BENEATH HIS DESK, HE PRODUCED A SECOND BAG,

THIS ONE FULL OF GRAVEL.

 

HE THEN MANAGED TO SHAKE THE​​ GRAVEL

BETWEEN THE BIGGER STONES IN THE JAR.

 

A SECOND TIME, HE ASKED THE STUDENTS, “IS THE JAR FULL?”

 

“NO,” THEY ANSWERED.

THEY WERE ON TO HIM BY NOW.

 

THEY WERE CORRECT, OF COURSE,​​ 

FOR THE PROFESSOR THEN PRODUCED A BAG OF FINE SAND.

 

HE MANAGED TO COAX MUCH OF THE SAND INTO THE SPACES​​ 

BETWEEN THE STONES AND THE GRAVEL​​ IN​​ THE JAR.

 

AGAIN HE ASKED, “IS THE JAR FULL?”

 

“PROBABLY NOT,” PROFESSOR, KNOWING YOU,”​​ 

THE STUDENTS REPLIED.

 

SMILING AT THEIR ANSWER,​​ 

THE PROFESSOR BROUGHT OUT A SMALL JUG OF WATER,

WHICH HE POURED INTO THE JAR​​ 

FULL OF STONES, GRAVEL, AND SAND.

 

WHEN NO MORE WATER WOULD FIT INTO THE JAR,

HE PUT DOWN THE JUG AND LOOKED AT THE CLASS.

 

“SO, WHAT DOES THIS​​ TEACH​​ YOU?” HE ASKED THE STUDENTS.

 

“THAT NO MATTER HOW BUSY YOUR SCHEDULE,”

OFFERED ONE OF THE STUDENTS,

“YOU CAN ALWAYS FIT IN ONE MORE THING!”

 

IT​​ WAS​​ A FAMOUS BUSINESS SCHOOL, AFTER ALL.

 

“NO!” THUNDERED THE PROFESSOR EMPHATICALLY.

 

“WHAT IS SHOWS​​ 

IS THAT IF YOU WANT TO GET THE​​ BIGGEST​​ STONE IN,

YOU HAVE TO GET IT IN​​ FIRST.”

 

IT WAS A LESSON IN​​ PRIORITIES.

(Adapted from an illustration in Ajahn Brahm,

Who Ordered This Truckload of Dung?, pp. 190-191.)

 

THIS BUSINESS SCHOOL ILLUSTRATION

IS A POWERFUL METAPHOR FOR TODAY’S COMMANDMENT,

OR LIFE-GIVING WORD,

 

“YOU SHALL HAVE​​ NO​​ OTHER GODS​​ BEFORE​​ ME.”

 

IF WE ARE TO HONOR THIS COMMANDMENT,

IF WE ARE TO RECEIVE​​ LIFE​​ FROM​​ THIS WORD FROM GOD,

 

WE MUST​​ PUT THE GOD WHO FREES FROM SLAVERY

INTO THE JAR OF OUR LIFE​​ FIRST.

 

WE MUST PUT THE GOD WHO FREES FROM SLAVERY

INTO THE JAR OF OUR LIFE​​ FIRST

 

IF​​ GOD IS GOING TO​​ FIT​​ INTO OUR LIFE​​ ​​ 

AS ANYTHING​​ BEYOND​​ A​​ DECORATIVE​​ APPENDAGE.

 

WE MUST PUT THE GOD WHO FREES FROM SLAVERY

INTO THE JAR OF OUR LIFE​​ FIRST

 

IF​​ GOD IS GOING TO FIT INTO OUR LIFE​​ AT​​ ALL.

 

WE MUST MAKE THE GOD WHO FREES FROM SLAVERY

FIRST​​ IN OUR THOUGHTS AND​​ FIRST​​ IN OUR ACTIONS.

​​ 

ONLY IF THE GOD WHO FREES FROM SLAVERY IS​​ ALLOWED TO BE

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF FAMILY;

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF COUNTRY;

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF​​ THE​​ ECONONY;

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF​​ MY​​ ECONOMY;

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF CAREER;

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF HEALTH;

 

FIRST​​ IN TERMS OF​​ EVERYTHING,

 

WILL GOD REALLY BE ALLOWED TO​​ BE​​ GOD.

ONLY IF THE GOD WHO FREES FROM SLAVERY​​ 

IS​​ FIRST​​ IN​​ ALL​​ ASPECTS OF OUR LIVES

 

WILL​​ THE​​ FREEDOM​​ AND​​ WHOLENESS​​ THAT GOD OFFERS

BECOME​​ REAL​​ FOR​​ US.

 

AMEN.​​ 

 

Independent and United Church of Christ